No exceptions? In this case, it is not very sensible, is it? To me, these questions are no longer about netctl 1.4-2. I even think it is a very good rule to have all [core] packages go through [testing] first. However, there might be cases where it is not what you'd want (of which this incarnation of netctl might be one).
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/11/13 19:47, Jouke Witteveen wrote: >> Is there a reason the patched version (thanks) is going through >> [testing]? We now have a package that causes problems in [core] and a >> version that doesn't cause these problems and for the rest is not >> worse in [testing]. >> >> Just curious, >> - Jouke >> > > All [core] packages MUST go through [testing]. > > Allan >
