On 8 August 2017 at 23:20, keenerd <keen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Above all we're grown-ups who can weight the pros and cons on a case > by case basis and make their own decisions as appropriate. I'm glad > that Arch Linux has gotten so good that this is the worst issue you > can find, but that doesn't mean it is worth "fixing". > Agreed it's not the biggest issue in the world. I've had official packages break as somewhere down the tree dependency X was removed. That I believe it something that should be fixed in it's root.
To my earlier question - "has it been discussed before" a clear "no, it hasn't" would have been great. A "newcomers are not the best people to start such threads" would also suffice. > Furthermore, I refuse to be trolled into bikeshedding over how to best > remove anti-bikeshedding measures. > By being humble and sincere my reply comes as trolling? Sounds like you had to deal with a bit too many trolls. So be it. Emil
