On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Dieter Plaetinck <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2011 11:09:02 -0500 > Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > >> since you seem to think it is so trivial to implement- > I actually said the exact opposite. Maybe you should read what I said first. I'll eat crow here on this one, I apologize. Looking back at it, I missed your "I understand this is probably hard to fix, on the other hand" line. Sorry about that.
>> Pierre clearly stated why we aren't able to do this at this time > He only referred to a prior discussion which I could not find back, so I > asked for the link. > >> being told our work isn't good enough really sucks the fun out of it. (blah >> blah blah) >> Not to sound like an ass, > > putting words I didn't say in my mouth and flaming me does make you sound > like one. > > I guess it can sometimes be hard to interpret the intention behind my (or > anyone elses) e-mails, > which can have caused a misunderstanding. Either way bad-mouthing anyone was > not my intention. I think it just comes down to an attitude misunderstanding, so I apologize. I got a bit worked up when your email ended with "which makes my job harder", which just rubs me the wrong way- we all do work around here, and saying that makes it sound like it isn't focused correctly in your eyes as it isn't doing enough to serve your purposes. I will make sure I fully read your emails from here on out and not interpret them as carrying malicious intent, but I do also encourage you to watch the way you put things- it can come across as very demeaning of other peoples efforts. -Dan
