On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:03:01 -0300 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 01:51 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > Hello all > > > > I want to know opinions about my recent work to archiso, since there > > are lots of changes. If someone can do some tests, they are very > > welcomed. Sugestions are very appreciated. Thanks :) > > > > > > > Basic documentation, done > Comments in code, done. > Testing all builds, done. > Booting all builds, done. > > Untested: archiso_pxe_nbd, and archiso_loop_mnt. > > > If there are no objections, I will merge dm-snapshot branch in official > master branch in about 12 hours. > > > commit msg is: > > [archiso] Use dm-snapshot instead of aufs2 (A.K.A. "The Big Commit") > > * Use device mapper + snapshot module, instead union layer filesystem. > * A block-level approach vs vfs-level. > * No more unofficial (Linux) things. > * More memory is needed. > * Refactor mkarchiso. > * Refactor hooks/archiso. > * New configs/releng to build official images. > * Removed configs/syslinux-iso. > * Removed archiso2dual script. Now functionallity integrated in > configs/releng. > * New configs/baseline to build the most basic live medium or use as template. > * New README file. > > try to keep the commit message current tense. i.e: s/Removed/Remove/ s/Now functionality integrated/Integrate functionality/ Maybe add something like: * Replace limited Makefile with new build.sh script And btw, I'm not sure 'releng' is a good name for the default configs, 'releng' is the name of the team doing the work and releasing images, but doesn't really describe the images which will be generated. I think something like 'installation-images' or 'official-images' or 'official-installation-images' or something would be better (the last one has my preference) Dieter
