On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:13:18 -0300 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 04:01 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > Hi, > > I see there are two directories with packages: > > /repo/any -> contains packages for "any" architecture > > /repo/pkg -> contains arch specific packages (i.e. i686 on an i686 > > live cd) plus symlinks to all files in /repo/any > > > > my questions: why do you name the directory /repo/pkg and not > > something like /repo/i686 ? specifying the architecture seems more > > sensible and consistent to me. Also, since these images are the > > copies of what's in core, why not use the name "core" in there > > somewhere? like /repo/core-any and /repo/core-i686 or even better.. > > why not follow the same convention as used on our mirrors? that > > seems like the cleanest. then it would be /repo/core/os/any > > and /repo/core/os/i686 (not sure why the 'os' subdir is needed > > though) > > > > Dieter > > > Please decide what pathnames like for both directories, I will change > them ;) > apparently 'os' is deprecated. So: /repo/core/any /repo/core/$arch (i686 or x86_64 depending on which live environment, maybe the dual images can even have them both?) Dieter
