On 08/07/2012 07:10 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:01:43 +0200 > Thomas Bächler <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 07.08.2012 17:45, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: >>>>> anyway, i wanted to do "transfer ownership" in github, but it complains >>>>> because >>>>> "jdodds/aif already exists" >>>>> so i'ld suggest you remove your aif repo on github (of course keep your >>>>> commits locally so you don't loose anything), then i'll transfer >>>>> ownership. >>>> >>>> Done. I'll do my best to take good care of AIF. >>> >>> i requested the transfer with github. good luck, and if you have any >>> questions, don't hesitate to get in touch, i'll try to provide feedback >>> where I can (but you can take it in the direction you want) >> >> At some point, I'd like to transfer the permissions to the official AIF >> repo on archlinux.org. I won't do that until I see some work done >> though. Until then, ask an Arch developer to pull your github. >> >> > > the way I saw it, Jeremiah would become the primary maintainer (in his github > repo) > and we remove http://projects.archlinux.org/aif.git/ > quite frankly, that repo has done nothing but causing confusion. I've always > preferred github. > > now you're basically saying "arch linux developers" are the new aif > maintainer. that's fine by me too. > I didn't expect any arch devs to be interested in the burden of maintaining > aif. > > Dieter >
In my opinion, I see this confusion the primary reason nobody contributes to AIF. Is AIF an arch project or not? If is in arch project, then our users should use our bugtracker to report bugs, use arch-releng to send patches. If not, then why we are discussion this here? -- Ionuț
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
