Am Sun, 22 May 2016 19:55:40 -0300 schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]>:
> Hello > > Some people complains about current [2016.04] (724M) size of our only > ISO image is greater than CD [700M]. Next month ISO will be about > (743M). > > (1) Keep things like now, and fix the Download page test "The image > can be burned to a CD" -> "The image can be burned to a DVD". > (2) Provide again single ISO per architecture (CD-friendly) and dual > ISO (DVD needed). > (3) Provide only single ISO per architecture (CD-friendly). > (4) Remove some tools from ISO. > > > Personally I am a bit neutrally here, I do not use CD or DVD for > years, but I do not like the option (4), many tools are here by user > request along time. My vote is for option (1) then (2). > > Thanks for reading. Hello, the actual ISO is too big to get it just on-the-fly. I'd like to have a per architecture to be able to get a quite small image on-the-fly (3), but having also a dual ISO is a nice additional feature (2). To be honest: I cannot remember the last time I had to start or configure a machine without x86_64 architecture... Customized images with additional graphical interface like NepuLinux [0] should also be splitted into smaller architecture ISOs. The actual image is near the 1GB border. [0] https://mirror.mylinuxtime.de/nepulinux/ -- Regards, Michael Gisbers http://gisbers.de GnuPG Fingerprint: DD12 A30E 5070 68C7 B405 C18E D51C 8A53 63B4 835B GnuPG PublicKey: http://tinyuri.de/mgisberspub
pgpJtmcJWFfnP.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
