On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:15:55 -0600
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> > >
> > > 2) One thing that made me very happy in the Arch, was the package 
> > > manager. Absolutally pacman is one of the best. But, has just one big 
> > > defect. The extension. The extension "pkg.tar.gz" is too long! The 
> > > most famous package manager using short extension like rpm, deb and 
> > > tgz. Look the difference:
> > >
> > > bash-3.0-3.pkg.tar.gz
> > > bash-3.0-3.rpm
> > > bash-3.0-3.deb
> > > bash-3.0-3.tgz
> > >
> > > Be more direct is essential. We know that pacman is a tar.gz based, but
> > > we are not force to use tar.gz in the extension. And more. This 
> > > extension can be confuse to the new user that see "tar.gz" in the end. 
> > > Someones will not associate with a package manager. My suggestion is 
> > > use a new extension like "pac".
> > >
> > > bash-3.0-3.pac
> > > bash-3.0-3.rpm
> > > bash-3.0-3.deb
> > > bash-3.0-3.tgz
> > >
> > >
> > > I think "pac" is beauty and easy to remind.
> > >
> > >
> 
> I will only comment on this subject:
> 
> I think it's a great idea as it gives the packages an identity that it needs 
> so when people see it they and know it belongs to Arch.
> i.e. foo.rpm -> RedHat/Mandrake
> foo.deb -> Debian
> foo.pac -> Arch/pacman
> 
> YEAH!
> slyski
> 
> Get R Done
> 
> 

Second that!

nicke

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to