i upgraded it.. and i like it :-D :-D my test app runs a bit faster.. dunno about exactly how much thou since im still a wee lil novice ;-D
On 4/24/05, Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 15:01 +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > > > >>The glibc package is deprecated (it doesn't compile with the gcc4). I > >>have no time to fix it but maybe someone of you has it (the redhat > >>snapshots should be ok). > >> > >>Matthias-Christian Ott > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>arch mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > > > In the release notes of glibc 2.3.5 there was a notice about 2.3.6 that > > will get released once gcc 4.0 is stable. > > Since gcc 4.0 is only out for a few moments now, I think it's best to > > wait until glibc 2.3.6 comes out. The Gentoo people advise the same: > > http://ramblings.hudscabin.com/blogs/index.php/2005/04/22/gcc_4_0_0 > > I don't think it's a bad idea to wait for the next glibc release and > > start switching to gcc 4.0 then. > > > > As the blog post says, gcc 4.0 should be compatible with gcc 3.4, so we > > don't have to recompile the whole distro in one day to get gcc 4.0 moved > > to current. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > According the Redhat Mailing List the current snapshot is fully GCC 4.0 > compatible. So why don't we upgrade? Some people talked about 5% - 10% > more speed. > > Matthias-Christian Ott > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > -- ~Rob http://sn0n.com/ _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
