no i think a programm like mozilla compiled with gcc 4.0 is faster then mozilla compiled with gcc 3.x
On Mon, 2 May 2005 14:23:25 -0500 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/2/05, Neoklis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matthias Viehrig wrote: > > > > >the code should also be faster > > > > > >On Mon, 2 May 2005 12:06:49 -0500 > > >Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > I think this is relevant to this thread: > > > > http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/gcc4/index.html > > Ah, I think you missed the debate: the original claim is that gcc4 > compiled with gcc4 produces faster code than gcc4 compiled with gcc3.4 > It was similar to saying "gimp draws better pictures if compiled with gcc4" > > That said, that link is pretty informative. > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch -- running windows on a pentium is like having a brand new Porsche but only be able to drive backwards with the handbrake on. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
