The two packages dont conflict with each other, they happily coincide, so we wouldnt need to set the conflict.
iphitus On 6/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vivek Ayer wrote: > >> Instead of using the common hpijs + hpoj solution for printing, I want > >> to use HPLIP. No arch packages have been submitted for hplip and I was > >> wondering whether someone can port hplip with PKGBUILD. I want to use > >> that Toolbox UI for printer management. > > > > Hello list, > > > > me too I 'd love to see HPLIP in arch. Perhaps it would make sense to > > replace the hpijs package with hplip since the latter is a superset of > > the former and it is more recent, supporting more printers. > > Hey gang; > > Some other distros that have already replaced the older HP drivers with > the newer stuff ARE having some users reporting problems. At this early > date it may make more sense to have both packages and to set the > "conflict" field accordingly in the PKGBUILD for the newer stuff. At least > until such time as things are more settled. > > Very best regards; > > Bob Finch > > > > > > Moreover, something more I would like to see is the latest afpl > > ghostscript (8.51) with the patch in the following bug applied. > > > > http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687907 > > > > This way, together with the latest hplip drivers, black will be truly > > black in HP printers :-). > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Dimitris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > -- iphitus - www.iphitus.tk _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
