On Saturday 02 July 2005 01:59, Mircea Bardac wrote:
> Is there a strategy for including Qt4 into ArchLinux?
Nice to see you're up early :) Are there even any programs that use QT4 yet?
>
> I have the following suggestions
Number two seems like the most sane choice, with a slight change.
> 2.
> a) release qt3-3.3.4-9 with "provides=(qt)"
> b) change gradually ALL qt3 dependant apps to 'depends=("qt3")';
> c) release qt3-3.3.4-10 with no "provides=(qt)"
> d) check if anything breaks (if it does, return to b) )
> e) release qt-4.0.0-1 and the apps live happily ever after
I think the package name should be qt4, not just qt -- since different major
versions of qt are not really very comparable.
--
vk
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
