Vinay Shastry wrote on 06 Jul 2005 11:00 CEST: > Oh and Hugo seems to be very interested in flaming for no reason, if > we go with his/her arguments, then almost all of the udev rules can be > taken off cos "just 1 in 1000 may restrict the use of audio, optical, > video or other devices". blah on flames and hugo, no ones gonna do > anything to texteditors, dont worry. :P
If my intention was to flame, I would've used different wording. Just because I'm outspoken on this subject, doesn't make me a flamer. Anyway, I can live with a separate 'games' group if you want it so bad. But it has a vague definition. Audio for example is clear: access to the audio devices on the system. But hey, I can use telnet to play a MUD. Please add it to the 'games' group too. :P And add Mozilla too please. I don't want people playing browser games. But that's not the same as an own prefix. Why should games have their own subdir? They're programs like any else. I'm not saying that we need to dissect doom3 into the unix hierachy of /usr/bin /usr/share /usr/lib, etc. - just save yourself the trouble and dump it in /opt. But I don't see why games like lbreakout2 would have to be placed in /usr/games/bin and /usr/games/share... It only makes them difficult to find and it has absolutely no advantage. It's the same as putting all texteditors in /usr/texteditors (at which you laughed). Hugo _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
