heya,

i understand the problem you and tpowa are facing since we have the same issue 
with archie-kernel package and i admit we do the same. however, we plan on 
changing it since i think its important to know the kernel exact subversion, 
mainly when kernel-vulnerability is detected. ofcourse, "pacman -Qi kernel26" 
will do the job, but i think having "uname -r" report 100% correct subversion 
is just as important imho.

maybe there could be a better solution? i havnt investigated it too much, but 
maybe using a symbolic link in the modules path (ie, 2.6.12 to point to 
latest - 2.6.12.2, etc)? i might be completely off the case, so i better stop 
here...

On Friday 08 July 2005 22:59, Judd Vinet wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> As you all well know by this point, the kernel developers have taken to
> releasing minor updates every week or so (2.6.12.1, 2.6.12.2, etc.).
>
> This has really increased the kernel maintenance workload for tpowa and
> myself, because each kernel rebuild means that all extraneous modules
> (nforce, ipw2X00, ltmodem, slmodem, etc.) need to be rebuilt with that
> version.
>
> To try save us some time, tpowa has reworked the kernel 2.6 PKGBUILDs
> slightly. We still stay up to date with the latest minor revision of the
> kernels, but we change the internal version number so that the last
> minor revision number is truncated. For example, when you install
> kernel26-2.6.12.2-1 and run "uname -r", it will say 2.6.12 instead of
> 2.6.12.2.
>
> This saves us time, because tpowa no longer has to rebuild all
> extraneous modules with each minor revision upgrade. It means a quicker
> build process and less time involved in moving kernel-related packages
> back and forth between Extra and Testing.
>
> If you have any questions or concerns, send them to the ML or myself and
> tpowa.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> - J
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

-- 
regards,
Elia Yehuda, aka z4ziggy
Archie project developer,
http://user-contributions.org/archie.html

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to