> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:11:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Um, there are examples of PKGBUILDs that utilize two sets of source
>> tar balls to make up the one resulting binary package. In this case I
>> think that is warranted.
>
> For two reasons, I don't like to include it into gimp:
> 1. Actually gimp sourcees come with a help browser, which would require
>    libgtkhtml. Contrary to what one would guess from the name, this is a
> gnome libraray and hence no option because it is in extra and I don't
> wanna make gnome a dependency for gimp.
> 2. The help sources, and this is the actual reason, are another 18! MB,
>    and thus nearly twice as big as the gimp package itself. This is far
> away from any commensurability. And as long as we can ship the help
> seperately we will do it. I mean even the upstream authors make it
> two tarballs, I think this is why.
>
> -tobbi
>

You say toemaatoe and I say toemaytoe.

Whatever.

Bob




_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to