On 7/18/05, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is related to the pacman upgrade. > > > > > > You notice how it still says "upgrading subversion... done."? That means > > > that subversion upgraded with no problems. > > > > > > There is a technical reason for the checks, but not the output (you'll > > > have > > > to ask Judd why he added that ;) ). > > > > > > Jason > > > > Jason, I have no idea what you said, heh... the errors look like the > > standard > > archlinux-changed-something-with-perl-and-its-broke-because-perl-is-terrible > > errors.... > > > > pacman -S perl (say yes) will fix it. > > Actually, what everyone thinks is a problem actually isn't. THERE IS NO > PROBLEM PEOPLE. There's nothing to see here. Move along. > > Jason
Oh man, I looked back at cactus' email and yours (which I didn't understand at first) and I get it now - those messages are while *upgrading* via pacman not while running svn... I'm just loopy.... 8) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
