On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 02:21:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hold on - if it was a GPL package wouldn't the license be in > > /usr/share/licenses/common/GPL > > ;)
Yes, it would be. That's why I just used it as an example for you. I figured you'd be smart enough to realize that the glibc package would not actually have a custom license :P Jason -- If you understand, things are just as they are. If you do not understand, things are just as they are.
pgpLOt0P9chhn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
