On Wednesday 14 September 2005 14:19, Damir Perisa wrote: > this means that all new pkgs that are dependend on gcc or deps go to > [testing] first. that's why there is not that much activity in CURRENT > but a lot in TESTING. > I understand, but the two pkgs aren't even in testing.
> | As an example take links: Last > | Updated: 2005-04-04, ok i contacted dorphell on irc and let him know, > | but still no update. > > did you updated it for yourself to try if it builds against gcc 4.0.1 > (ABS)? if it does not build, this may be the reason why it is not updated > yet.... there are of course other reasons that may be possible ... > I don't use testing, so i compiled it against current and extra and gcc3.x. And if there's a problem with building against 4.0.1 then why not build it against current and put it into current? > btw: try "elinks" ;-) Thanks, will try it > > | Or bluefish Last Updated: 2005-07-09. There have been 2 new versions > | since then, pkg is flagged out-of-date and still nothing... > > http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/ has only the 1.0.2... can you point me to > some other place that has newer versions? > Yes, the webmaster seems to be sleeping but when you choose a mirror from http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/download.html you'll see 1.0.3 and 1.0.4. I grabbed it and there's no a single word that it's a beta or what. It seems like normal stable release. I wondered too when i was going to send a bugreport and there were two never versions in bugzilla to choose from. -- --pholie _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
