I know the problem, and I have had it before. 

I am looking into it.... I dont think it is a gcc issue, and yes it is
a unoinfs issue.

I will release archck4 when I do find out why it's happening. Con
uploaded ck4 yesterday.

Sorry I have taken a while to reply, I got a new toy yesterday, an iPod nano.

I'lll report back soon,

James

On 9/15/05, Matthew G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom K wrote:
> 
> > Matthew G wrote:
> >
> >> Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:
> >>
> >>> Matthew G wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Eric Belanger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Matthew G wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I finally get around to building it and what happens?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> CC      fs/unionfs/main.o
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> fs/unionfs/main.c: In function `init_unionfs_fs':
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> fs/unionfs/main.c:933: error: parse error before "UNIONFS_VERSION"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> make[2]: *** [fs/unionfs/main.o] Error 1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> make[1]: *** [fs/unionfs] Error 2
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> make: *** [fs] Error 2
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any suggestions? This is archck3.1 - patches applied to clean src.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Phil
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> James Rayner wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ArchCK is a derivation of the CK patchset that is taking a similar
> >>>>>>>> path to the old CKO patchset. It aims to include a variety of
> >>>>>>>> popular
> >>>>>>>> features and updates that have not currently made it to the
> >>>>>>>> vanilla
> >>>>>>>> kernel. Con Kolivas' CK patchset is the core of ArchCK and wouldnt
> >>>>>>>> exist without it (thanks Con).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Patch (Apply patch to 2.6.13 - Already includes 2.6.13.1):
> >>>>>>>> http://iphitus.loudas.com/arch/ck/patch-2.6.13-archck3.bz2
> >>>>>>>> http://iphitus.loudas.com/arch/ck/patch-2.6.13-archck3-dsdt.bz2
> >>>>>>>> Broken Out
> >>>>>>>> http://iphitus.loudas.com/arch/ck/2.6.13-archck3-broken-out.tar.bz2
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://iphitus.loudas.com/arch/ck/2.6.13-archck3-dsdt-broken-out.tar.bz2
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Website:
> >>>>>>>> http://iphitus.loudas.com/archck.php
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Changes from 2.6.13-archck2:
> >>>>>>>> updated ck to 2.6.13-ck3
> >>>>>>>> updated reiser4 to reiser4 from 2.6.13-mm2
> >>>>>>>> updated unionfs snapshot to 020908
> >>>>>>>> added software suspend
> >>>>>>>> added some software suspend fixes
> >>>>>>>> -dsdt  added custom dsdt patch
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I had a request to add the custom acpi dsdt table patch. I have
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>> merged this with the main patch, as I am not sure how this will
> >>>>>>>> effect
> >>>>>>>> fbsplash. If you're using fbsplash and a custom dsdt, please
> >>>>>>>> tell me
> >>>>>>>> if you have a problem.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Arch Linux Users, archck is available in the community
> >>>>>>>> repository, to
> >>>>>>>> get it, add the community repo and pacman -S kernel26archck. It
> >>>>>>>> should be updated sometime in the next day or two.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thomas: Give this one a shot and let me know how you go.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If anyone has any issues with this, drop me a line.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Enjoy,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> James Rayner
> >>>>>>>> /iphitus
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> iphitus.loudas.com / iphitus.blogspot.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> arch mailing list
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is this the ck patchset? I was able to compile my kernel with the
> >>>>>> ck patchset without a problem but I also didn't compile
> >>>>>> everything like the arch kernel has.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No. archck is ck patchset plus a few additionnal patches (similar
> >>>>> to the
> >>>>> ones cko used to have).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> arch mailing list
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> arch mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Oh ok. I might try this if I have a chance.
> >>>> Have you tried compiling it without unionfs?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That would kind of defeat the point of having a unionfs patch
> >>> included, wouldn't it really?  This is the kernel for [community] so
> >>> I include all the exciting options :)
> >>>
> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> arch mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> arch mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >>>
> >> Yes, but if you compile without unionfs and it works wouldn't you be
> >> sure that the issue is within unionfs? Then if it is you might be
> >> able to report it. BTW if I get chance to try this out what are you
> >> compiling with unionfs like what opitions and a module or built in
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> arch mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >>
> > I've already successfully compiled my own version without unionfs, so
> > that would seem to be where the problem is alright.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >
> If I get a chance probably over the weekend I would try to compile with
> unionfs and see if it works. By any chance are you using gcc4? That
> might be causing trouble if I am.
> Note: I might not know what I'm talking about.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> 


-- 
iphitus - www.iphitus.tk

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to