Andrew Conkling:
>It seems that there are a lot of automounters out there at the
>moment--autofs, automount, supermount, submount, ivman--but which one
>is the best to use?  I know that D-BUS/HAL make for very good
>handling, but do any of the kernel people have opinions on which one
>to use?  I'm looking for something in userspace but completely
>DE-independent.  I've been using ivman but it seems complicated and
>hasn't been working for me.  Is there something simpler I could try?

I've never liked complicated automounters too.
I've been using submount mostly but I'm going to move everything to pure 
udev rules. 

Submount is easy and it worked well for me but udev is more powerfull 
and more in the spirit of KISS. Exept the time when they change it
5 times in a month :-) For now udev seems quite stable and it has
everything that is needed.

If you want to try submount I'd suggest recompiling it using ABS because
it depends on the kernel version. It's easy and quick. You'll find the PKGBUILD
and example fstab entries in the forums. I'm was using it for my cd/dvd 
burner and external IDE harddisk connected via IDE to USB connector.

For udev just go and read wiki + search forums for examples and links to
howtos.

-- 
Rafal Szczepaniak (Lanrat)

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to