> On 9/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:42:28PM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: >> > Even the considered user-friendly Fedora has only the updates and >> extras repos in its configuration by default which implies that they >> expect the user to do a little browsing on his own... >> But they have LOTS of packages there. Arch does (relatively) not >> without [community]. >> >> Leslie >> >> -- >> PGP-KID: 0x52D70289 >> > > But why comment it pacman.conf at all? > > Like i said, the packages from community are great, and we all trust our > TUs dont we? > > really? > > reeeallly? > > I do. but do you? > > James >
Hey James and the gang; Um, isn't the aur filled with packages that are not (yet) checked by a tur ? As such, isn't it a good idea to leave things as they (currently) are ? (I do like the suggestion of the installer asking the installee whether the repo should be uncommented. And then having a installer script to do so. - But that is "frosting on the cake" so to speak, and up to the fella(s) writing the installer script. Having such a script is hardly necessary at all.) Very best regards; Bob Finch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
