If you are using udev, devfsd is not needed. On 9/26/05, Andrew Conkling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/26/05, Rosenstrauch, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If we're using udev (i.e., booting with devfs=nomount) is it still > > necessary to have the devfsd package installed? > > I'm pretty sure I removed mine a while ago after I found that it > wasn't running. Probably want to have someone a bit more certain > confirm that first though; I don't want you tracking me down because > your USB drive won't work. :P > > -- > http://aconkling.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >
-- ~ Patrick Burroughs A.K.A. 'Celti' AIM: nCelti ICQ: 209670498 Yahoo!: nCelti Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Google Talk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
