On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:52:16 +1000 James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Removing documentation is *part* of the way Arch works, slimmer and > more streamlined packages that arent overly customised.
Now, please don't get me wrong, but I think removing the documentation is to customize the software. The developers chose that these files should be installed with their software, and when we're touching anything between what the developers wants for the users and what the users actually get, we're customizing. Anyway, while I would prefer to have the files on my computer that the developers expect me to, I don't think it's a huge problem. BTW: What are all that Arch artwork doing in the KDE packages? Shouldn't it be kept in some other package so the people that actually wants it can install it? The one thing I _love_ about Arch is that it in general is so unintrusive, with the KDE packages being the only exception. -- .-. Mark Rosenstand (-.) oo| cc ) /`'\ (+45) 255 31337 3-n-( (\_;/) [EMAIL PROTECTED] _(|/`-> _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
