On Sunday 02 October 2005 16:24, Martin Lefebvre wrote: > Normally, I would assume pacman -Sw would work just like pacman -S... which > means you need to specify a package name... but according to your examples, > there wasn't one specified
Hmm... it does work for single packages, as I remember now I've used it once. The man page got me confused. Pacman is really great, but from time to time I find some switches (combiations) which don't work as I expect. This might be the downside of having one program do all the packaging stuff. I haven't used all pacman's switches, I don't have a globar overview of all options, so I can't suggest improvements on this side, without coliding with existing stuff. Mircea /IceRAM -- http://mircea.bardac.net
pgpNHadwtm31H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
