Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 13:21 +0200, Attila wrote:
> > as i complie tellico 1.0.2 i got an error about that libtool is
> > missing the file "libxml2.la". Than i take the PKGBUILD for libxml2
> > from abs, comment out the last line (#find $startdir/pkg -name
> > '*.la' -exec rm {} \;") and compile libxml2 for myself as an own
> > package. After this i can compile tellico 1.0.2 and it works.
> >
> > So my question is: Are there any disadvantages to do it in this way?
>
> grep through /usr/lib/*.la and /opt/gnome/lib/*.la to look for .la
> files that need the missing .la file. Then look which package owns
> that file and recompile it with deletion of .la files.
Or even better, like you wrote in one of the news:
pacman -Ql |grep "\.la$"
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
