Ok thanks for the info, going to read that thread...
Eric Belanger wrote:
Some packages needs *.la files to work. KDE is one of them. Other examples
in this thread: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=15574
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Anton Paulic wrote:
Ok, I didnt know what one...here ya go.
/usr/lib/libfam.la is owned by fam 2.7.0-7
/usr/lib/libgiftproto.la is owned by gift 0.11.8.1-3
/usr/lib/libgnutls-openssl.la is owned by gnutls 1.2.6-1
/usr/lib/libsasl2.la is owned by cyrus-sasl 2.1.21-2
/usr/lib/libgift.la is owned by gift 0.11.8.1-3
/usr/lib/libgnutls-extra.la is owned by gnutls 1.2.6-1
/usr/lib/libgnutls.la is owned by gnutls 1.2.6-1
/usr/lib/giFT/libFastTrack.la is owned by gift-fasttrack 0.8.9-3
/usr/lib/giFT/libGnutella.la is owned by gift-gnutella 0.0.10.1-3
/usr/lib/giFT/libOpenFT.la is owned by gift-openft 0.2.1.6-3
Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:
You know, it would be much better if you did pacman -Qo on said files
and told us the pkg they belong to rather then the filename...
Anton Paulic wrote:
Hi there,
I just reinstalled from scratch after the big update, and there are
still some .la files hanging around.
Are they supposed to be there? Or are all .la files expected to be
gone by now?
So far I've found:
libfam.la
libgiftproto.la
libgnutls-openssl.la
libsasl2.la
libgift.la
libgnutls-extra.la
libgnutls.la
libFastTrack.la
libGnutella.la
libOpenFT.la
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
|
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
