> On 10/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I do not tend to do forums. For the very same reasons as Jason. He has >> sent copious amounts of email on this subject, so I will just say >> "ditto" to his comments on same. > > That's all well and good, but it looks like Jason is approaching it from > the aspect of being a dev, whereas when you're looking for > support it seems like a good idea to pursue all possible avenues. After > all, Jason does say, "There is lots of support on the > forum and lots of people use it."
Jason is a dev and I am a tu. But this is NOT relevant at all. Both Jason and I do not "do" forums for exactly the same reasons. If you like them, so be it. > > (And I'm done with that.) > > As for that FTP bug you reported, can you provide a link? Is it > related to what you mention about lilo? I agree with Todd, the issue > doesn't seem that serious considering Arch's philosophy but it would > obviously be moreso if it borked a new installation. > It is NOT an FTP bug, but rather a bug that will show up during an FTP style install. Yes it borks a new install IF done by way of FTP in as much as pango *IS* important to many things and pango will not work even though installed. - Bug no. 3132 Very best regards; Bob Finch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
