On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:30:06PM -0400, matthew g wrote: > I suppose but then I'll have to do that everytime I want to check if > there an update which can become a pain :( > On 10/16/05, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why not enable testing in pacman.conf - then do pacman -Sy > > testing/openoffice2 and disable testing in pacman.conf again? That is > > the way to do it! Just don't do a pacman -Syu! Simple. > > > > matthew g wrote: > > > > >No not fair :( I don't want testing but I want Ooo2 :( unstable is the > > >only place were I can get Ooo2 without a ton of other updates.
It's really interesting that you're so worried about it. Packages go into testing *before* going into current/extra. It will hit extra when we're happy with it and you can use it then. I don't expect it to be in testing for a long time or many updates. I find it strange that you want to use one repo for something it's not for just because you can't stand having another 8 packages that *may* be updated on your system if you have them installed (do you use jabberd, git-core, pidentd, gamin, xfsdump, or openvpn? if not, you'd only have two other packages updated. Two is hardly "a ton"). Please check your facts before complaining. Thank you for your time. Jason -- If you understand, things are just as they are. If you do not understand, things are just as they are.
pgpSJgfFtEVPR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
