erm.. just checked.. its not the 3.X compat packages i am looking
for.. its the gcc 2.X :P so the gcc 3.4 .. i really wont recommend :)

On 10/23/05, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Sunday 23 October 2005 07:09, Vinay Shastry a écrit:
>  | Well, actually, even i dont think its a good idea for providing compat
>  | libs, BUT, its a necessity .. a lot of commertial apps use the old
>  | gcc, for example. some versions of maya, mathematica and lots more..,
>  | so i strongly believe it is in the best interest of wider adoption of
>  | arch that we have to provide compat libraries.
>
> this is an argument. to people like you, i would suggest to go to AUR and
> vote for this package. if it gets enough votes and a willing TU to take
> it, it may land in [community] sometimes. it's democracy at work.
> everybody who needs it can take the PKGBUILD (thanks to ABS) and build it
> for him/herself. we are using arch, aren't we? very easy to run makepkg
> and let it compile for some hours in the background ;-)
>
> besides this way, i would suggest you and everybody else who comes to
> situations where other software is forcing you not to use gcc4 to address
> this people responsible for this software (commercial or not) that they
> are NOT future-safe and they need to take action or die out (this is
> evolution at work). if only one person in the whole world does this,
> nothing will happen for commercial apps, but if the owners of them get
> thousands of emails of reports that they are using outdated things, they
> will have to take action. (this is group dynamics and marketing)
>
> if we do not look at the future, we would be still running gcc 2.9x... and
> that is a horror scenario in the year 2005, if you ask me.
>
> my 2 cents, (we already have 4 cents in this thread ... in some years, we
> may have enough to buy a virtual pizza!!!)
>
> Damir
>
> --
> "If a machine couldn't run a free operating system, we got rid of it."
>
>   -- Richard Stallman (Open Sources, 1999 O'Reilly and Associates)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
>
>
>


--
Vinay S Shastry

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to