I mean why doesn't pacman/abs simply add the function, so we needn't add such line on the bottom of every PKGBUILD but turn it on/off in the makepkg.conf?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oscar Estrada Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [arch] E17, and libtool-slay On Tuesday 25 October 2005 1:27 pm, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:14:55 +0200 > > Tobias Kieslich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 20:00:34 +0200, Christer Solskogen wrote: > > > A module in e17 needs /usr/lib/libfreetype.la, and it is missing > > > after libtool-slay. Should I file a bug-report on this? > > > > Search for the .la file that tries to include libfreetype.la. I > > think there is another package on your system that isn't slayed. > > So what you are saying, .la files should not be used? Is something > wrong with the programs and libs I`m installing? > I`m trying some new e17 stuff, and I possibly installed some new .la > files (doing compiling by hand, not with abs) Hi, I also compile E17 by hand (but using ABS), and when doing my PKGBUILDs I compare them with the ones that Rensel makes (the TUR that put E17 on the AUR). And If you check them, he adds this line to them: find $startdir/pkg -name '*.la' -exec rm {} \; And in that way he avoids this libtool problem. Anyway, I recommend you to check all of his PKGBUILDS, to see what he does and what ./config options he uses. See ya! Oscarello _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
