On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:
> Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it as often as
> he likes if it was pkg'ed separately.  I think most people have to do
> the .pacnew tango when they update their initscripts and that's
> frustrating when the scripts themselves have not changed at all.

I didn't see a reason at all to update to the .pacnew files all the time.

Some day i feel like looking over the files i do... sometimes there are good 
changes in which i adobt, like the new network profiles (thanks in this case 
again for this great update).

I dont feel threatened to update all my files everytime i see there has been 
addad a .pacnew file, since this updates won't corrupt the system.

Regards,
Grabler Georg

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to