Sorry for the late response ...

I use fuse a lot, since encfs (which I also use a lot and love) depends on it.

I have wound up building fuse myself, which isn't too big a deal.  But as it's 
since been moved to extra, I guess I was figuring I wouldn't have to anymore.

Thanks,

DR


> Yeah, I caught this just yesterday - I'm not sure what Mark was
> planning on doing, but I know I decided I'd just ignore it until the
> new kernel came out - I'm not sure how important fuse is to you, but I
> know it's not that big a deal here.
> 
> It shouldn't be all too hard to recompile the fuse package yourself,
> but I guess it all depends on when exactly the new kernel will be
> released.
> 
> - phrak
> 
> On 11/23/05, Rosenstrauch, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks like the recently upgraded fuse package now either 
> doesn't build (or doesn't include) the fuse kernel module 
> when building the package.  That makes sense for the future, 
> since fuse will be part of the kernel as of v2.6.14.
> >
> > However, the Arch kernel packages are still at v2.6.13, so 
> excluding the module from the package is breaking fuse.
> >
> > Can either the fuse v2.4.2 package be rebuilt to include 
> the kernel module, or can the fuse package be rolled back to 
> v2.4.1 to fix this issue?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > DR

==============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications 
disclaimer: 

http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml

==============================================================================


_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to