Hi Patrick, * On 21 Dec 2005 * Patrick Leslie Polzer wrote:
> > Hello, > > I'd like to discuss a difficult topic without starting a religious debate. > Arch and most, if not all, other distributions (rescue CDs exempt) use bash > as the default shell. I wonder especially why Arch does this. > > zsh is a superset of bash and much more powerful. > fish is probably bash-compatible to a sane extent and very user-friendly and > fast. > > So why stick to bash? Arch could excel in this issue, too, by installing > zsh or fish as default in / and moving bash to /usr as an optional package. I just try out fish, but couldn't find where I can define some 'aliases'. Do you have an idea? Greetings! Fabian _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
