On Thu, January 5, 2006 4:08 pm, Tobias Kieslich said: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 15:20:38 -0800, randy wrote: >> Anyone know the status of monodevelop? It's been broken ever since mono >> was moved to /usr (for me anyway). I've read the bug and various forum >> posts. I managed to get an updated version of gtk-sharp-2 and got >> monodevelop 0.9 to compile against it, but it still crashes during >> startup >> (which is further than it got before). Are there plans to keep mono (et >> al) in extra or is the whole mono group going to unsuported/testing/etc? > > that monodevelop got broken when mono moved to /usr was coincident. > Since then upstream versions drifted and things got more difficult. I > also reached the point to get stuff compiled, but it crashes from the > start up. Are u running testing or current? just curious.
I'm not running any testing. > > Unfortunately, I'm a bit lost here. Upstream mailing lists aren't really > helpful, I cried out for help on the forum and in this mailing list. Not > really much came back. Moreover, I'm moving between continents and will > need some time to catch up with Arch after that. So for the time being > maybe someone else can help with it. Just to have that said, mono isn't > very popular among the devs, but we do our best. ATM, upstream packages > are a pain to maintain, I really wait for 1.2 to come up and monodevelop > 1.0. Things can mature down then. Let's hope that it'll work. > > I'm sorry that I can't help you here. > > -tobbi > I hear you that it's not very popular. I'm more interested in it to play with f-spot. I hope it's only a coincindence that a port of a M$ technology is actually acting like M$ technology ;) Thanks r. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
