On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 15:35 -0500, Andrew Conkling wrote: > On 1/10/06, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:32 +0000, Magnus Therning wrote: > > > I do use it, but only at work. Please remove the dependency, but add a > > > message so that I can be reminded to install it explicitly when I set > > > up > > > new machines at work. > > > > The point here is that the evolution support has to be compiled in to > > get it working. When compiling it in without having e-d-s installed on > > runtime, the clock applet won't work. > > Hmm, a thought: > Does this seem like something bugworthy? I don't know about you, but > e-d-s seems like it should be optional, the kind of component that > should be used if available but discarded if not. (Especially with > the friggin' clock!) If anyone else agrees, I'd be willing to post a > bug on GNOME about this; their lack of flexibility of this sort irks > me and fighting it in various and sundry ways often makes my todo > list. :)
The point for them is to make it a ./configure option, which is flexible for distros like gentoo and FreeBSD. For the package maintainer, it's a choice to be made for all users. That's why I'm asking :) Would be nice if it could be a runtime check if e-d-s is enabled by preference and load the clock if enabled. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
