On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:31:54PM -0800, Judd Vinet wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:18:52PM +0100, Attila wrote: > > I have [community] in my pacman.conf active and so i recognize at the last > > sync with pacman and abs that the new PKBUILD have judd as maintainer and a > > replaces line for the currnet kernel26. So my question is will arch switch > > to > > the archck kernel?
It was an error, I let iphitus know and went and did some preliminary fixes, like removing the replaces line and fixing the maintainer line. > > No, I don't think so. We try to stick to vanilla if possible, it seems > to keep things simpler. > > The CK kernel shouldn't have to replace kernel26 though, as long as it > uses different filenames in /boot. The vanilla one uses System.map26, > kconfig26, and vmlinuz26. If the CK package appended a 'ck' to those > names, it should get away without any file conflicts. > I did mark it conflicts, however, but Judd you bring up a good point. Iphitus, if you happen to read this, you can change that conflicts and just leave the provides on the next release. -S
pgpxLFkOwm1D1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
