On 2/6/06, K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was asked by a boost user to add jam/bjam to boost.  I was unaware
> there was a standalone package.  The boost jam version is newer, 3.1.11,
> but I'm guessing it's not the same codebase.

Heh, yeah - they're different code bases.  It always pisses me off
that Boost focuses so heavilly on Boost.Jam as a build system - they
could at least provide pkg-config files... sheesh

Even the Boost.Python documentation says "Feel free to use another
build system, but alot of people report that things don't work right
unless they use bjam" - sigh

>
> I'll do the conflicts/provides thing and upload -4.  sigh.
>
> k
>
>
> On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 22:41 +0000, Joao Estevao wrote:
> > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3898
> >
> > On 2/4/06, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yeah, looks like the new boost provides Boost.Jam which is a
> > > replacement for jam.  I guess it should conflict and provide it.
> > >
> > > On 2/4/06, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >   boost: /usr/bin/jam: exists in filesystem
> > > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] damir]# pacman -Qo /usr/bin/jam
> > > > /usr/bin/jam is owned by jam 2.5-1
> > > >
> > > > (i wanted to rebuild source-highlight that depends on =boost-1.33.1-2)
> > > >
> > > > - D
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ask the Wombat!
> > > >
> > > > Q: What is a kiss?
> > > > A: Well, this basically sums up your average Internet user, right
> > > > there.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > arch mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > arch mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > A mind all logic is like a knife all blade.
> > It makes the hand bleed that uses it.
> >
> > -- Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to