Robert Emil Berge wrote: > HI Eren, > > I've been using KDE most of the time for some months now, and I'm very > satisfied with how it works. I feel the KDE packages are some of the best > maintained in Arch Linux (without implying that any packages are poorly > maintained). > > I usud to think KDE was huge, slow and bloated, and usud mainly fluxbox and > occationally Gnome. One day I was bored I installed KDE, and to my surprise, > it didn't take forever to load, and once started it was noticeably quicker > than both Gnome and fluxbox. > > The other day, though, someone looked at my desktop and offended me by saying > it looked a lot like Windows. So now I'm writing this from KMail in E17. > > Robert > > Torsdag 09 februar 2006 14:30, skrev Eren Metin Elci: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I have been using Arch Linux for 3 Month now, after I came from >> gentoo. Now Iam thinking about installing KDE. For that reason I want >> to check if there are any problems or disadvantages by using KDE in >> ArchLinux, because it is against the goal "KISS". >> >> Greets Eren >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> arch mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >> > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > Cool you use E17? Did you use the CVS Sources or did you use a binary package for that? I tried the CVS but it fails by compiling "evas" the second lib in order.
Greets Eren _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
