Rhythm.G wrote:
> Jan de Groot wrote:
>   
>> On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 09:42 -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Why is Koffice 1.5 beta1 in testing?  Isn't this the kind of thing that 
>>> should 
>>> be in unstable?
>>>     
>>>       
>> Now and then we put beta stuff in testing. We did with Xorg7 RC4, we did
>> with GNOME 2.11.9x, we will do with GNOME 2.13.9x and it looks like we
>> did it for a KDE office suite also now.
>>
>> Whan a product announces the final beta or release candidate, it's the
>> time to get our packaging right. This way we can release these things
>> fast without having the final version in testing for ages.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> arch mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>>
>>   
>>     
> This is exactly what I advocated some months ago. :-), I believe this is 
> a right decision, to get more people testing them we will surely get 
> more stable current repository which will certainly increase our 
> distribution's reputation. We have built one with speed, now it's turn 
> for stability.
>   
Normally I wouldn't put stuff in testing that is to be considered 
unstable but as I use Koffice for everyday work I was able to test it 
properly. At least the functionality in Kword and Kspread I use work 
properly. What's more. the input filter for non-Kofficce document 
filters really got much better. It was about time to improve these 
features, they are essential for a working cross platform office after 
all. That's why I put it in testing, to please those who like Koffice 
but couldn't use it so far because of lacking support for documents 
im-/export.

Cheers!

Alex



_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to