* Thomas Bächler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Judd Vinet wrote: > > No plans yet. Dale has spec'ed out a beefier machine than we had > > originally hoped for, so we'll have a real powerhouse as the main Arch > > server. > > I am curious: Will it be running Arch? > Nah, Arch is not ment for server. I was researching and evaluating for days now, which edition it should be... I think we should go with Windows Small Business Server 2003 Premium Edition.
We need frontpage and SQL. So this is clear... With the extra money from the donations this is no issue, correct? For reference: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/facts/default.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsServer2003/sbs/evaluation/features/default.mspx HTH, Benny
pgp9D0vt6ANUc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
