I'm in agreement atm. Right now esp ghostscript is fucked in the latest release. So it'd be nice to try other ghostscript packages and see if they work.
On 3/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh and why are there only one ghostscript package included? well, actually > don't > answer that one: the thing is that i need GNU ghostscript because my > printer > lj1010 only works with that one(i think) and the one in repo doesn't even > say > which ghostscript package it is(pacman -Qi ghostscript) when it's like 4 > separate gs packages out there! > > this is bad, very bad.. :P > > On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:20:42 +0100, A. S. Budden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > Is there any reason for the exclusion of the Ghostscript '.so' library > > from the ghostscript package? If users (i.e. me!) want to use gsview > > or any other software that links into ghostscript dynamically, they > > have to compile the library themselves. Apparently, Fedora includes > > it, so I was wondering if it would be possible to add it to Arch as > > well. I think that all that is required is to add a "make clean; > > configure; make so; make soinstall" (with the appropriate options etc) > > to the PKGBUILD. Alternatively, I guess it could be in a separate > > package, but I wouldn't know how to go about this... > > > > Thoughts/opinions? > > > > Al > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > > > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
