There was a similar problem like this on the 64bit arch which was fixed though I can't tell you how I think the package was remade (I may be wrong though).
On 3/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 10:43:40AM -0800, Judd Vinet wrote: > > > What does "pacman -Q avahi" tell you? Perhaps something is funky with > > your local pacman db. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% pacman -Q avahi convmv glade libextractor > avahi 0.6.7-1 > convmv 1.09-1 > glade 2.12.1-2 > libextractor 0.5.9-1 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% sudo pacman -S avahi convmv glade libextractor > :: avahi-0.6.7-1: is up to date. Upgrade anyway? [Y/n] n > :: convmv-1.09-1: is up to date. Upgrade anyway? [Y/n] n > :: glade-2.12.1-2: is up to date. Upgrade anyway? [Y/n] n > :: libextractor-0.5.9-1: is up to date. Upgrade anyway? [Y/n] n > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% sudo pacman -Su > :: parted: local (1.7.0rc1-1) appears to be newer than repo > (current/1.6.25.1-1) > :: wine: local (20050830-1) appears to be newer than repo > (extra/0.9.9-1) > :: Above packages will be skipped. To manually upgrade use 'pacman -S > <pkg>' > > Targets: avahi-0.6.7-1 convmv-1.09-1 glade-2.12.1-2 libextractor-0.5.9-1 > > Total Package Size: 7.9 MB > > Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n] n > > -- > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289 > http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/ > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
