On 3/13/06, Benjamin Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Aaron Griffin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Also, netiquette typically says that you should bottom-post, not > > top-post, as it's easier for MUAs to thread properly. > > Normally threading is done with the In-Reply-To header... So that > shouldn't make a difference... If you use a non-broken email-client this > will work even if you bottom post.
Right, right - I meant threading within each message - that is, vim and gmail can both fold out quoted sections but get confused when there's a top/bottom conflict with post order. As in: >>> This is a long >> conversation >>>that went like >this > A.: Because it breaks the logical order of conversation. > Q.: Why is top posting bad? LAWL! _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
