On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:05:18 +0200, Damir Perisa wrote:
> Sunday 09 April 2006 20:36, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
>  | >   xpdf: is required by xpdf-japanese
>  |
>  | poppler out of the blue provides some binaries and man pages
>  | usually provided by xpdf(poppler stems from the xpdf codebase).
>  | This conflict is solved in latest packages. These binaries will be
>  | provided in poppler in future. If you need binaries like pdf2ppm
>  | etc you will have to ibstalled poppler now instead of xpdf.
> 
> so the xpdf-LANG pkgs should be possible to be installed with poppler 
> instead of xpdf, right? if so, then poppler should provide=(xpdf) or 
> xpdf-LANG pkgs should depend on some virtual string that is provided 
> by xpdf and poppler. i guess you already did this needed changes, 
> right? 
Good guess, I'm not sure though how much usefull, if at all, the xpdf
language packs are for poppler and its helper binaries. So I don't
know, eg. if applications like kpdf or evince profit from an installed
xpdf-$LANG pack. Can anybody check that?

        -tobbi

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to