Thomas,

I noticed that I put in [stable] instead of [release]... I caught that
yesterday after a discussion with canyonknight... but I haven't had a
chance to update it.

I wasn't quite sure if [release] was updated for any reason, or if it
was purely a snapshot.... whether packages could be replaced in a
'snapshot' if there was a large enough security concern.... but I guess
it is implied that any new install should update with pacman -Syu ASAP
to be current.

As far as [community], I had originally considered including
[community], however this falls into the more murky area. As of yet, we
plan on holding communication between devs using Flyspray, I wasn't sure
if TU's were included in the bug-tracking system. I would like to
include [community], but make sure that we're not jumping in over our
head right away. Starting with the core system seems like a good
stepping stone. If this service becomes more useful and with more
volunteers... I'm sure we could include [community] in the scope of the
project.

Thanks for your input, I appreciate it!

-James



.:: On 04/27/2006 01:20 PM - Thomas Bächler wrote ::.
>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Security_Task_Force
> 
> I love the idea. Two comments though:
> 
>> ALST Will Strive to Monitor all Packages within the following repositories:
>>
>>    * [stable]
>>    * [current]
>>    * [extra]
>>    * [testing]
>>    * [unstable]
> 
> 1) There is no [stable] repository. There is a [release] repository, but the 
> Devs only update it on
> a CD release. As we don't support it, there shouldn't be security support for 
> release. Security
> support should concentrate on the up-to-date repos.
> 2) We should add [community] to the list.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

-- 
-------------------------
James Fryman
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell   : 757.812.3126
GnuPG  : 0xDAE2C750

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to