On 5/17/06, Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:57:14 +0200, Thomas Bächler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > >> > >>> buuut, i just changed the pkgver and removed the md5sums from the > >>> pkgbuild > >>> in abs and built from that one, so my wine 0.9.13 which has the force > >>> flag > >>> sat to 'y' still shouldn't be "upgraded" by an older release, should it? > >>> Because that would be a bug wouldn't it? > >>> > >> The force-flag doesn't affect the package, it only affects the repo you > >> put the package in. So you > >> will still be forced to 0.9.11 (which was originally done because 0.9.12 > >> was only trouble). > >> > >> > > > > hmm, you know what would be cool? To be able to somehow inform users about > > why given > > package isn't updated yet, because I just assumed it was due to lazyness > > or something. > > > > new mailing-list? "package-problems" or something? > > > > Subject: Wine on hold > > > > Reason: Ie doesn't work anymore, + X other reasons (where you would fill > > in X) > > > > What do you think? Asking too much? Just get used to it? > > > > > > The reason is given in CVS: "forced downgrade, due to many issues with > 0.9.12" >
I did say that already, AND I gave an explanation it has been "force=y"'ed .. yet Tom needs to repost it .. tut tut guys, read it the first time around ! Rohan. -- Rohan Dhruva Proud GNU/Linux user. Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?" http://www.dhruva.be/ _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
