Arch Linux 1.0 codename MYTH!!!!

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

2006/5/18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Send arch mailing list submissions to
         [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of arch digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: What about pacnew files? (Christer Solskogen)
   2. Re: What about pacnew files? (Mac!eKs)
   3. Re: Codenames for Arch 0.8 (Mr FUBAR)
   4. Re: Codenames for Arch 0.8 (Lukas Ruzicka)
   5. Re: Codenames for Arch 0.8 (Vinay S Shastry)
   6. Re: Request for info: how to find /arch/setup
      (Moritz Alexander Esser)
   7. Re: Codenames for Arch 0.8 (Bozhidar Batsov)
   8. Re: Codenames for Arch 0.8 (Vinay S Shastry)
   9. Re: Codenames for Arch 0.8 (Rohan Dhruva)
  10. Subject: Re:  Codenames for Arch 0.8 (mundoalem)
  11. Re: Subject: Re: Codenames for Arch 0.8 (Lukas Ruzicka)
  12. Re: i18n packages (Thomas B?chler)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:04:46 +0200
From: Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] What about pacnew files?
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux < [email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Thorsten Grothe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using archlinux a couple of months now and I'm pretty happy with it.
> It is simple, the community is very friendly and pacman is even better
> than apt-get. Arch Linux is my destop distro of choice. Very good work!
>
> Yesterday I did a pacman -Syu to upgrade my system. This worked fine.
> But now I have a lot of *.pacnew files. How can I get rid of them
> automatically?
>

"find . -name '*.pacnew' -exec rm {} \;" should work. But thats not what
you want to do :)
You probably want to check the pacnew-files against the other files you
got, and do the changes yourself, until someone makes a pacnew-diff
utility.

--
cso




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:07:42 +0200
From: "Mac!eKs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] What about pacnew files?
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux < [email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Thorsten Grothe napisa?(a):
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using archlinux a couple of months now and I'm pretty happy with it.
> It is simple, the community is very friendly and pacman is even better
> than apt-get. Arch Linux is my destop distro of choice. Very good work!
>
> Yesterday I did a pacman -Syu to upgrade my system. This worked fine.
> But now I have a lot of *.pacnew files. How can I get rid of them
> automatically?

a semi-automatic solution is to use dotpac, you can find it in AUR:
Name:                   dotpac 0.2-1
Description:            This little bash script helps you getting rid of
your /e
tc/*.pac* files.

--
Mac!eKs




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:39:40 +0200
From: "Mr FUBAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8
To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux" < [email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

0.8 - Itchy Scrot

On 5/18/06, Rohan Dhruva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arch Linux 0.8 WeAreReallyExceedingOurselvesHere :D ;)
>
> Rohan.
>
> --
> Rohan Dhruva
> Proud GNU/Linux user.
> Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
> Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
> FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"
> http://www.dhruva.be/
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:34:26 +0200
From: "Lukas Ruzicka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8
To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

ArchLinux 0.8 (Sodalite)


:)))))
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/attachments/20060518/6be96d1d/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:47:36 +0530
From: Vinay S Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"

My take:

ArchLinux 0.8 (Vibrance)
ArchLinux 0.8 (Light)
ArchLinux 0.8 (Prestige)
ArchLinux 0.8 (Dragon)
ArchLinux 0.8 (Butterfly)
ArchLinux 0.8 (Creative)
ArchLinux 0.8 (Community)
ArchLinux 0.8 (Myth)

--
Vinay S Shastry



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:36:51 +0200
From: Moritz Alexander Esser < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] Request for info: how to find /arch/setup
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <[email protected] >
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

It's in the CVS and on the install-cd.
Just gunzip the initrd and mount it. Just ask if you need further
instructions...
BTW it's just a really small script :)

Moritz

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am new to Arch Linux and I hope this is not a FAQ answered again and again.
> BTW, Arch Linux is just fantastic!
>
>
> My question is: can I find the setup program that is run during the CD
> installation anywhere on the internet? Somewhere in the CVS tree maybe? I would
> like to look up some details even when I am not running Arch Linux.
>
> Thanks in advance and kind regards
>
> Volker
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch



------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:01:31 +0300
From: Bozhidar Batsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Subject: Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <[email protected]>
Message-ID: < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Vinay S Shastry wrote:
> My take:
>
> ArchLinux 0.8 (Vibrance)
> ArchLinux 0.8 (Light)
> ArchLinux 0.8 (Prestige)
> ArchLinux 0.8 (Dragon)
> ArchLinux 0.8 (Butterfly)
> ArchLinux 0.8 (Creative)
> ArchLinux 0.8 (Community)
> ArchLinux 0.8 (Myth)
>
>
Arch Linux 0.4 was already named Dragon. Read the list of the previous
codenames before making any propositions.



------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:43:05 +0530
From: Vinay S Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Subject: Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <[email protected]>
Message-ID: < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"

On Thursday 18 May 2006 16:31, Bozhidar Batsov wrote:
> Vinay S Shastry wrote:
> > My take:
> >
> > ArchLinux 0.8 (Vibrance)
> > ArchLinux 0.8 (Light)
> > ArchLinux 0.8 (Prestige)
> > ArchLinux 0.8 (Dragon)
> > ArchLinux 0.8 (Butterfly)
> > ArchLinux 0.8 (Creative)
> > ArchLinux 0.8 (Community)
> > ArchLinux 0.8 (Myth)
>
> Arch Linux 0.4 was already named Dragon. Read the list of the previous
> codenames before making any propositions.

heh sorry, in that case.. make it Dragon-2 ;-)
--
Vinay S Shastry



------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 18:11:16 +0530
From: "Rohan Dhruva" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8
To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux" <[email protected] >
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

How did everyone know that its 0.8 next, and not 0.7.3 ?
Anyway,

Arch 0.8 (BonBon)
Arch 0.8 (Tulip)
Arch 0.8 (Symphony)
Arch 0.8 (OpenPac)
Arch 0.8 (WeRock)
Arch 0.8 (W30wnZj00)
Arch 0.8 (Wanda)
Arch 0.8 (Munchkins)
Arch 0.8 (Riddhi)
Arch 0.8 (Apeksha) --> Thats hindi for "expectation"
Arch 0.8 (Alpa)
Arch 0.8 (Sridevi)
Arch 0.8 (Priyanka)

Rohan.

--
Rohan Dhruva
Proud GNU/Linux user.
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"
http://www.dhruva.be/



------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:42:44 -0300
From: mundoalem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [arch] Subject: Re:  Codenames for Arch 0.8
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Here it it my idea:

Arch Linux 0.8 Iguara

It's a word in the Tupi, that's a tongue brazillian indians spoke and
speak (at least the ones which were not klilled). It means

"the place where you drink water"

I don't know how to explain the sound, but the 'i' sounds like the 'e'
and the 'a' sound like the 'a' on the word 'car'. The rest I think
keeps the same.

Thanks

---------
g00nie



------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:18:14 +0200
From: "Lukas Ruzicka" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] Subject: Re: Codenames for Arch 0.8
To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Good one

On 5/18/06, mundoalem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here it it my idea:
>
> Arch Linux 0.8 Iguara
>
> It's a word in the Tupi, that's a tongue brazillian indians spoke and
> speak (at least the ones which were not klilled). It means
>
> "the place where you drink water"
>
> I don't know how to explain the sound, but the 'i' sounds like the 'e'
> and the 'a' sound like the 'a' on the word 'car'. The rest I think
> keeps the same.
>
> Thanks
>
> ---------
> g00nie
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>



--
Zat?m ahoj,
Luk??
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/attachments/20060518/107cb998/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:47:34 +0200
From: Thomas B?chler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arch] i18n packages
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15

Thomas B?chler schrieb:
> Looks like firefox i18n-packages are coming quickly now. As I said before, I'll have a look at the
> votes. I might as well adopt them all if there is enough interest for them. I'll play and test a bit
> this weekend.

The following language packages should appear in community now:
mozilla-firefox-de
mozilla-firefox-fr
mozilla-firefox-pl
mozilla-firefox-pt_br
mozilla-firefox-ru
mozilla-thunderbird-de

If there is more interest in thunderburd language packs, pleae tell me. For thunderbird the LANG
variable isn't used automatically yet, see this bugreport: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4647
If you want to use thunderbird language packs, you have to set intl.locale.matchOS to true.



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch


End of arch Digest, Vol 19, Issue 45
************************************

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to