> > What about /etc/net <http://etcnet.org/> ? > > Has anyone ever played with this stuff? > I just looked at the homepage, this really looks interesting. If it can > easily be integrated into > Arch, it might be a great improvement. IMHO etcnet is too complicated and not fits well into Arch philosophy. It also seems to require iproute2. But I think Arch can take some ideas from etcnet to improve network profiles features. Anyway network profiles and/or etcnet[-like] config systems should stay _optional_ feature, as IMHO many users are satisfied with simple network config in rc.conf. Setting simple network config using more complicated system (like etcnet) is a bit overkill (IMHO). Don't forget that etcnet was originally designed for use with ALT Linux which uses System V style initscripts, while Arch uses BSD style.
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
