On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:34:19PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:57:55 +0200 > schrieb Isenmann Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Firefox is an app, that I thought, everyone uses everyday. So, this > > update is essential. > > > You all remember the security discussions? What sense does it make to > bring such security related updates only to testing? > > We should have enough manpower to do both: updates for current/extra and > for testing! >
Well, if you'd take moment to consider the situation... The packages in testing will be moved out any day now, and when firefox was updated (3 days ago), I'd say it was safe to say that the same was expected. Now if a developer is running testing on his machine so that he could do the testing updates, you expect him to change several hundred megabytes worth of packages on his system (things in extra are only built against extra and/or current), in order to do that one update, only to switch back to testing and possibly later have to rebuild it again? Sorry but in my mind it's only logical that it was built against testing, and put in testing with the anticipation that it will be moved into current along with the rest of testing in a couple days. -- Simo Leone Arch Linux Developer
pgpGm9hJzw5tG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
