Jose M. Prieto wrote: > Sorry, I didn't explain myself well. When 20060501-3 was in current and > 20060501-1 in testing, a "pacman -Syu" whould not have upgraded to the > greater version in current, because testing takes precedence as it appears > before in pacman.conf. This is what I asked whether it is a bug in pacman. > >
You explained yourself perfectly, Jose - I may have answered your question a bit too literally i.e. Is this a bug? No, it's not. The longer answer is that this is the way pacman works - when a package is being upgraded, pacman will take it from the first repo it finds it in, regardless of the pkgver or pkgrel. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
